2003 Cadillac CTS vs. 1984 Fiat Argenta
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Fiat Argenta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Fiat Argenta would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac CTS (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1984 Fiat Argenta. (100 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1984 Fiat Argenta.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Cadillac CTS (245 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Fiat Argenta. (135 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2003 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Fiat Argenta.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Cadillac CTS | 1984 Fiat Argenta | |
Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
Model | CTS | Argenta |
Year Released | 2003 | 1984 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2597 cc | 1584 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 179 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83.3 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.6 mm | 71.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 35 L |