2003 Caterham 7 vs. 1943 Jeep MB
To start off, 2003 Caterham 7 is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1943 Jeep MB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1943 Jeep MB would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1943 Jeep MB is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Caterham 7 (160 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1943 Jeep MB. (59 HP @ 3820 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 1943 Jeep MB. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1943 Jeep MB weights approximately 580 kg more than 2003 Caterham 7.
Because 1943 Jeep MB is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Caterham 7. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1943 Jeep MB will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Caterham 7 (176 Nm @ 5750 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1943 Jeep MB. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2003 Caterham 7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1943 Jeep MB.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Caterham 7 | 1943 Jeep MB | |
| Make | Caterham | Jeep |
| Model | 7 | MB |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1943 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1794 cc | 2199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7500 RPM | 3820 RPM |
| Torque | 176 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5750 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 500 kg | 1080 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 3330 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1460 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 810 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2040 mm |
