2003 Caterham 7 vs. 2012 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2012 Lotus Evora is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Caterham 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Caterham 7 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Lotus Evora is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Lotus Evora (276 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 2003 Caterham 7. (160 HP @ 7500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Lotus Evora should accelerate faster than 2003 Caterham 7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Lotus Evora (349 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 173 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Caterham 7. (176 Nm @ 5750 RPM). This means 2012 Lotus Evora will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Caterham 7.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Caterham 7 | 2012 Lotus Evora | |
Make | Caterham | Lotus |
Model | 7 | Evora |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1794 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 276 HP |
Engine RPM | 7500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 349 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5750 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 4341 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1849 mm |
Vehicle Height | 810 mm | 1222 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2576 mm |