2003 Dodge Kahuna vs. 1976 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2003 Dodge Kahuna is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,429 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Kahuna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Kahuna (212 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 1976 Toyota Celica. (78 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Kahuna should accelerate faster than 1976 Toyota Celica.
Because 1976 Toyota Celica is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Toyota Celica. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Kahuna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Dodge Kahuna (339 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 204 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Toyota Celica. (135 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2003 Dodge Kahuna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Dodge Kahuna | 1976 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Dodge | Toyota |
Model | Kahuna | Celica |
Year Released | 2003 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2429 cc | 1588 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 212 HP | 78 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1320 mm |