2003 Dodge Ram vs. 1950 Holden FX

To start off, 2003 Dodge Ram is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Ram (215 HP) has 164 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Dodge Ram weights approximately 960 kg more than 1950 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1950 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Ram, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Dodge Ram (319 Nm) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Holden FX. (136 Nm). This means 2003 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Holden FX.

Compare all specifications: