2003 Fiat Panda vs. 2013 Cadillac XTS

To start off, 2013 Cadillac XTS is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Fiat Panda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Fiat Panda would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac XTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac XTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 263 more horse power than 2003 Fiat Panda. (51 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac XTS should accelerate faster than 2003 Fiat Panda. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac XTS weights approximately 1052 kg more than 2003 Fiat Panda. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2013 Cadillac XTS is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Fiat Panda. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac XTS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac XTS (358 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 270 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Fiat Panda. (88 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac XTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Fiat Panda. 2013 Cadillac XTS has automatic transmission and 2003 Fiat Panda has manual transmission. 2003 Fiat Panda will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac XTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Fiat Panda 2013 Cadillac XTS
Make Fiat Cadillac
Model Panda XTS
Year Released 2003 2013
Body Type Hatchback Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1108 cc 3564 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 51 HP 314 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 6800 RPM
Torque 88 Nm 358 Nm
Torque RPM 2750 RPM 5200 RPM
Engine Bore Size 70 mm 94 mm
Engine Stroke Size 72 mm 86 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 11.5
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front AWD
Transmission Type Manual 6-speed automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 860 kg 1912 kg
Vehicle Length 3540 mm 5131 mm
Vehicle Width 1600 mm 1852 mm
Vehicle Height 1550 mm 1510 mm
Wheelbase Size 2610 mm 2831 mm
Fuel Consumption 4.8 L/100km 9 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 5.7 L/100km 11.8 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 35 L 76 L