2003 Ford Econoline vs. 1998 Nissan El Grand
To start off, 2003 Ford Econoline is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Nissan El Grand. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Nissan El Grand would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Econoline weights approximately 355 kg more than 1998 Nissan El Grand.
Because 2003 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Nissan El Grand, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford Econoline | 1998 Nissan El Grand | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Econoline | El Grand |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1998 |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 3200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 1970 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1950 mm |
