2003 Ford Falcon vs. 2004 Ford Falcon

To start off, 2004 Ford Falcon is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Falcon would be higher. Both 2003 Ford Falcon and 2004 Ford Falcon are equipped with a 3,984 cc engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 220 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 357 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Ford Falcon 2004 Ford Falcon
Make Ford Ford
Model Falcon Falcon
Year Released 2003 2004
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3984 cc 3984 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 220 HP 220 HP
Engine RPM 4900 RPM 4900 RPM
Torque 357 Nm 357 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 3000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 92.3 mm 92.3 mm
Engine Stroke Size 99.3 mm 99.3 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.6:1 9.6:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1515 kg 1515 kg
Vehicle Length 4910 mm 4910 mm
Vehicle Width 1880 mm 1880 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 2800 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 59 L 59 L