2003 Ford Laser vs. 2012 Nissan Murano

To start off, 2012 Nissan Murano is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Laser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Laser would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Nissan Murano is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan Murano (260 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 155 more horse power than 2003 Ford Laser. (105 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Murano should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Laser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Nissan Murano weights approximately 676 kg more than 2003 Ford Laser. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Nissan Murano (325 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 180 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Laser. (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2012 Nissan Murano will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Laser.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Ford Laser 2012 Nissan Murano
Make Ford Nissan
Model Laser Murano
Year Released 2003 2012
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1598 cc 3500 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 105 HP 260 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 145 Nm 325 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 4400 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual CVT
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1115 kg 1791 kg
Vehicle Length 4260 mm 4823 mm
Vehicle Width 1710 mm 1882 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1727 mm
Wheelbase Size 2620 mm 2824 mm