2003 Ford Mustang vs. 1996 Mazda RX-01

To start off, 2003 Ford Mustang is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda RX-01. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda RX-01 would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Mustang (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 183 more horse power than 1996 Mazda RX-01. (217 HP @ 8500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1996 Mazda RX-01. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Mustang weights approximately 392 kg more than 1996 Mazda RX-01. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2003 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mazda RX-01, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Mustang (530 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 310 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda RX-01. (220 Nm @ 6000 RPM). This means 2003 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda RX-01.

Compare all specifications: