2003 Honda Fit vs. 2012 Volkswagen Polo

To start off, 2012 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Honda Fit. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Honda Fit would be higher. At 1,335 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Honda Fit is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Volkswagen Polo (104 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2003 Honda Fit. (82 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 2003 Honda Fit. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 28 kg more than 2003 Honda Fit. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volkswagen Polo (175 Nm @ 1550 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Honda Fit. (123 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2012 Volkswagen Polo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Honda Fit.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Honda Fit 2012 Volkswagen Polo
Make Honda Volkswagen
Model Fit Polo
Year Released 2003 2012
Body Type Hatchback Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1335 cc 1200 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 82 HP 104 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 123 Nm 175 Nm
Torque RPM 2800 RPM 1550 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1060 kg 1088 kg
Vehicle Length 4320 mm 3970 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1682 mm
Vehicle Height 1490 mm 1462 mm
Wheelbase Size 2460 mm 2470 mm