2003 Mazda 6 vs. 1971 NSU Ro 80
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 NSU Ro 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 NSU Ro 80 would be higher. At 2,390 cc, 1971 NSU Ro 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 NSU Ro 80 (114 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1971 NSU Ro 80 should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 6 weights approximately 135 kg more than 1971 NSU Ro 80.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 6 (240 Nm) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 NSU Ro 80. (162 Nm). This means 2003 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 NSU Ro 80.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mazda 6 | 1971 NSU Ro 80 | |
Make | Mazda | NSU |
Model | 6 | Ro 80 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1971 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1594 cc | 2390 cc |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 162 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1210 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2860 mm |