2003 MCC Crossblade vs. 2000 Tata Estate
To start off, 2003 MCC Crossblade is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Tata Estate. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Tata Estate would be higher. At 1,948 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Tata Estate is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 3 more horse power than 2000 Tata Estate. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 2000 Tata Estate. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Tata Estate weights approximately 900 kg more than 2003 MCC Crossblade.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Tata Estate (119 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 2000 Tata Estate will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
2003 MCC Crossblade | 2000 Tata Estate | |
Make | MCC | Tata |
Model | Crossblade | Estate |
Year Released | 2003 | 2000 |
Engine Size | 598 cc | 1948 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 102 Nm | 119 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3210 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 1640 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 4630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2830 mm |