2003 MCC Smart vs. 1975 Datsun 260Z
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Datsun 260Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Datsun 260Z would be higher. At 2,565 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 Datsun 260Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Datsun 260Z (163 HP) has 57 more horse power than 2003 MCC Smart. (106 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1975 Datsun 260Z should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Datsun 260Z weights approximately 225 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1975 Datsun 260Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Datsun 260Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1975 Datsun 260Z (213 Nm) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Smart. (145 Nm). This means 1975 Datsun 260Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 MCC Smart | 1975 Datsun 260Z | |
| Make | MCC | Datsun |
| Model | Smart | 260Z |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1975 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1499 cc | 2565 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 106 HP | 163 HP |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 213 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84.8 mm | 79 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 8.3:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 975 kg | 1200 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3760 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2581 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 60 L |
