2003 MCC Smart vs. 1996 Oldsmobile SS
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Oldsmobile SS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Oldsmobile SS would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Oldsmobile SS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Oldsmobile SS (202 HP) has 96 more horse power than 2003 MCC Smart. (106 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Oldsmobile SS should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Smart.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Oldsmobile SS (318 Nm) has 173 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Smart. (145 Nm). This means 1996 Oldsmobile SS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 MCC Smart | 1996 Oldsmobile SS | |
| Make | MCC | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Smart | SS |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1499 cc | 3791 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 106 HP | 202 HP |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 318 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3760 mm | 5130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1900 mm |
