2003 MG ZT vs. 2010 Geely Ck1
To start off, 2010 Geely Ck1 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 MG ZT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 MG ZT would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 MG ZT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MG ZT (158 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 2010 Geely Ck1. (85 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 MG ZT should accelerate faster than 2010 Geely Ck1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MG ZT weights approximately 445 kg more than 2010 Geely Ck1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MG ZT (215 Nm @ 2100 RPM) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Geely Ck1. (110 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 2003 MG ZT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Geely Ck1.
Compare all specifications:
2003 MG ZT | 2010 Geely Ck1 | |
Make | MG | Geely |
Model | ZT | Ck1 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1342 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 215 Nm | 110 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2100 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1485 kg | 1040 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2440 mm |