2003 Renault Megane vs. 2012 Audi RS3
To start off, 2012 Audi RS3 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Renault Megane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Renault Megane would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 2012 Audi RS3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi RS3 (335 HP) has 238 more horse power than 2003 Renault Megane. (97 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi RS3 should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Megane.
Because 2012 Audi RS3 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Renault Megane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi RS3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi RS3 (450 Nm) has 323 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Megane. (127 Nm). This means 2012 Audi RS3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Megane.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Renault Megane | 2012 Audi RS3 | |
Make | Renault | Audi |
Model | Megane | RS3 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1389 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 335 HP |
Torque | 127 Nm | 450 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |