2003 Westfield XTR 2 vs. 2010 Lincoln MKX
To start off, 2010 Lincoln MKX is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Westfield XTR 2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Westfield XTR 2 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Lincoln MKX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Lincoln MKX (265 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 2003 Westfield XTR 2. (173 HP @ 9800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Lincoln MKX should accelerate faster than 2003 Westfield XTR 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Lincoln MKX weights approximately 1470 kg more than 2003 Westfield XTR 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Westfield XTR 2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Westfield XTR 2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Lincoln MKX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Westfield XTR 2 | 2010 Lincoln MKX | |
| Make | Westfield | Lincoln |
| Model | XTR 2 | MKX |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 1299 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 173 HP | 265 HP |
| Engine RPM | 9800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 440 kg | 1910 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4737 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1925 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2824 mm |
