2004 Audi A6 vs. 2012 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet
To start off, 2012 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Audi A6 would be higher. At 4,179 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi A6 (300 HP) has 35 more horse power than 2012 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet. (265 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 2012 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet weights approximately 188 kg more than 2004 Audi A6.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi A6 (401 Nm) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet. (336 Nm). This means 2004 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi A6 | 2012 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | A6 | Murano CrossCabriolet |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4179 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 265 HP |
Torque | 401 Nm | 336 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1825 kg | 2013 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4829 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1681 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2824 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.8 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 82 L |