2004 Audi TT vs. 1957 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2004 Audi TT is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,424 cc (8 cylinders), 1957 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1957 Cadillac 62 (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2004 Audi TT. (225 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1957 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2004 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 429 kg more than 2004 Audi TT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1957 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Audi TT | 1957 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | TT | 62 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1957 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1754 cc | 5424 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 267 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 2004 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2050 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 3290 mm |
