2004 Audi TT vs. 2012 Jaguar XJ

To start off, 2012 Jaguar XJ is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Audi TT would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jaguar XJ (271 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 2004 Audi TT. (180 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2004 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 488 kg more than 2004 Audi TT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2012 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jaguar XJ (600 Nm) has 375 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Audi TT. (225 Nm). This means 2012 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Audi TT.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Audi TT 2012 Jaguar XJ
Make Audi Jaguar
Model TT XJ
Year Released 2004 2012
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1754 cc 3000 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 5 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 180 HP 271 HP
Engine RPM 6200 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 225 Nm 600 Nm
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1325 kg 1813 kg
Vehicle Length 4050 mm 5252 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1895 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1456 mm
Wheelbase Size 2410 mm 3157 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 8.1 L/100km 5.8 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 11.2 L/100km 9.7 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 9.8 L/100km 7.2 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 55 L 82 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]