2004 Caterham 7 vs. 2012 Opel Combo
To start off, 2012 Opel Combo is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Caterham 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Caterham 7 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Caterham 7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Caterham 7 (251 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 162 more horse power than 2012 Opel Combo. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 2012 Opel Combo.
Because 2004 Caterham 7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Caterham 7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Opel Combo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Caterham 7 (258 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Opel Combo. (126 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2004 Caterham 7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Opel Combo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Caterham 7 | 2012 Opel Combo | |
Make | Caterham | Opel |
Model | 7 | Combo |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1364 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 8000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 258 Nm | 126 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Top Speed | 241 km/hour | 164 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 4330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 810 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2720 mm |