2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1947 Jeep CJ2A
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Jeep CJ2A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Jeep CJ2A would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1947 Jeep CJ2A. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1947 Jeep CJ2A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 190 kg more than 1947 Jeep CJ2A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 1947 Jeep CJ2A. (145 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1947 Jeep CJ2A.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 1947 Jeep CJ2A | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Jeep |
| Model | Tracker | CJ2A |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1947 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2491 cc | 2199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 165 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 221 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 3130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1460 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2040 mm |
