2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1983 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1983 Lincoln Continental. (114 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1983 Lincoln Continental. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 386 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Lincoln Continental. (210 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Lincoln Continental.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 1983 Lincoln Continental | |
Make | Chevrolet | Lincoln |
Model | Tracker | Continental |
Year Released | 2004 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 2443 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 210 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1686 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 5120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2760 mm |