2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2002 Honda That
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Honda That. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Honda That would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 2002 Honda That. (67 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 2002 Honda That. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 460 kg more than 2002 Honda That. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Honda That. (151 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Honda That.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 2002 Honda That | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Honda |
| Model | Tracker | That |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2491 cc | 750 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 165 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Torque | 221 Nm | 151 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 66 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 64 mm |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 840 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 50 L |
