2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2004 Ford Focus
To start off, both 2004 Chevrolet Tracker and 2004 Ford Focus were released in the same year (2004). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2004 Ford Focus. (129 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Focus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Focus weights approximately 62 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Focus (330 Nm) has 109 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (221 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Focus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 2004 Ford Focus | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Tracker | Focus |
Year Released | 2004 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 1981 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 330 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 88 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1362 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 53 L |