2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2006 Chrysler 300

To start off, 2006 Chrysler 300 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 3,523 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chrysler 300 (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 320 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chrysler 300 (339 Nm) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (221 Nm). This means 2006 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Chevrolet Tracker 2006 Chrysler 300
Make Chevrolet Chrysler
Model Tracker 300
Year Released 2004 2006
Body Type SUV Station Wagon
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2491 cc 3523 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 165 HP 250 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 6400 RPM
Torque 221 Nm 339 Nm
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1300 kg 1620 kg
Vehicle Length 4140 mm 5010 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1890 mm
Vehicle Height 1670 mm 1490 mm
Wheelbase Size 2490 mm 3050 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 10.7 L/100km 8.7 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 12.4 L/100km 12.4 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 11.8 L/100km 10.7 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 61 L 68 L