2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2007 Nissan Sentra
To start off, 2007 Nissan Sentra is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2007 Nissan Sentra. (140 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 2007 Nissan Sentra.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Nissan Sentra. (199 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Nissan Sentra.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 2007 Nissan Sentra | |
Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
Model | Tracker | Sentra |
Year Released | 2004 | 2007 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 199 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4570 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.7 L/100km | 6.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.4 L/100km | 8.3 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 55 L |