2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2011 Koenigsegg Agera
To start off, 2011 Koenigsegg Agera is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Koenigsegg Agera is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Koenigsegg Agera (1,100 HP) has 1003 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Koenigsegg Agera should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 28 kg more than 2011 Koenigsegg Agera.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 2011 Koenigsegg Agera | |
Make | Chevrolet | Koenigsegg |
Model | Tracker | Agera |
Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 1100 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Biofuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1318 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4293 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2660 mm |