2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1958 DKW 600
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 DKW 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 DKW 600 would be higher. At 4,161 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (275 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 245 more horse power than 1958 DKW 600. (30 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1958 DKW 600.
Because 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 DKW 600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (373 Nm) has 316 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 DKW 600. (57 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 DKW 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1958 DKW 600 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | DKW |
| Model | TrailBlazer | 600 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4161 cc | 671 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 275 HP | 30 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 373 Nm | 57 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 74 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.1:1 | 7.3:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
