2004 Ford E-150 vs. 1999 Renault Scenic
To start off, 2004 Ford E-150 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Renault Scenic. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Renault Scenic would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1999 Renault Scenic. (136 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 1999 Renault Scenic. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-150 weights approximately 732 kg more than 1999 Renault Scenic. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-150 (388 Nm) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Renault Scenic. (188 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Renault Scenic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford E-150 | 1999 Renault Scenic | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | E-150 | Scenic |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1999 |
| Body Type | Van | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1870 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 136 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 388 Nm | 188 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2127 kg | 1395 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1680 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2570 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 6.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 8.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 60 L |
