2004 Ford E-250 vs. 1981 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 2004 Ford E-250 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1981 Mazda RX-7. (104 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1981 Mazda RX-7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-250 weights approximately 1310 kg more than 1981 Mazda RX-7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-250 (389 Nm) has 244 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Mazda RX-7. (145 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Mazda RX-7.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford E-250 | 1981 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | E-250 | RX-7 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1981 |
Body Type | Van | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 389 Nm | 145 Nm |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2370 kg | 1060 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2430 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 65 L |