2004 Ford E-250 vs. 2013 Aston Martin DB9
To start off, 2013 Aston Martin DB9 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford E-250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford E-250 would be higher. At 5,900 cc (12 cylinders), 2013 Aston Martin DB9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Aston Martin DB9 (470 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 245 more horse power than 2004 Ford E-250. (225 HP @ 6150 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Aston Martin DB9 should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford E-250. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-250 weights approximately 610 kg more than 2013 Aston Martin DB9.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Aston Martin DB9 (601 Nm) has 212 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford E-250. (389 Nm). This means 2013 Aston Martin DB9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford E-250.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford E-250 | 2013 Aston Martin DB9 | |
| Make | Ford | Aston Martin |
| Model | E-250 | DB9 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Van | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4605 cc | 5900 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 470 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 389 Nm | 601 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 89 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 79 mm |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2370 kg | 1760 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 4710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2017 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1270 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2745 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 11.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 18.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 80 L |
