2004 Ford E-350 vs. 1952 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2004 Ford E-350 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1952 Jaguar XK. (158 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1952 Jaguar XK. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 1193 kg more than 1952 Jaguar XK. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Jaguar XK. (290 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Jaguar XK.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford E-350 | 1952 Jaguar XK | |
| Make | Ford | Jaguar |
| Model | E-350 | XK |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5408 cc | 3441 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 255 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 475 Nm | 290 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 90.1 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 106 mm |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2488 kg | 1295 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2600 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 63 L |
