2004 Ford E-350 vs. 1981 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2004 Ford E-350 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 189 more horse power than 1981 Mazda Cosmo. (66 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1981 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 1293 kg more than 1981 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 333 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Mazda Cosmo. (142 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford E-350 | 1981 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | E-350 | Cosmo |
Year Released | 2004 | 1981 |
Body Type | Van | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 2210 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 475 Nm | 142 Nm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2488 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2620 mm |