2004 Ford E-350 vs. 2007 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2007 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford E-350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford E-350 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 2007 Mitsubishi Colt. (179 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2007 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 802 kg more than 2007 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 220 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Mitsubishi Colt. (255 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford E-350 | 2007 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | E-350 | Colt |
Year Released | 2004 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 2970 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 179 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 475 Nm | 255 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2422 kg | 1620 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2970 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 95 L |