2004 Ford Econoline vs. 2012 BMW 640
To start off, 2012 BMW 640 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 BMW 640 (311 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 2004 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 BMW 640 should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Econoline weights approximately 390 kg more than 2012 BMW 640.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 BMW 640 (630 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 292 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2012 BMW 640 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Econoline | 2012 BMW 640 | |
Make | Ford | BMW |
Model | Econoline | 640 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | Van | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 311 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 630 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 1935 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4894 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1894 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1365 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2855 mm |