2004 Ford Puma vs. 1973 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2004 Ford Puma is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,678 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Puma (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1973 Mitsubishi Colt. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1973 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Puma weights approximately 125 kg more than 1973 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Puma (149 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Mitsubishi Colt. (120 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2004 Ford Puma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Puma | 1973 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Puma | Colt |
Year Released | 2004 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1678 cc | 1498 cc |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 149 Nm | 120 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1035 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2360 mm |