2004 Ford Ranger vs. 1996 Renault Megane

To start off, 2004 Ford Ranger is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Renault Megane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Renault Megane would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Ranger (207 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1996 Renault Megane. (114 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1996 Renault Megane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Renault Megane weights approximately 91 kg more than 2004 Ford Ranger.

Because 2004 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Renault Megane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Ranger (323 Nm) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Renault Megane. (168 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Renault Megane.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Ford Ranger 1996 Renault Megane
Make Ford Renault
Model Ranger Megane
Year Released 2004 1996
Body Type Pickup Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4015 cc 1995 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 207 HP 114 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5400 RPM
Torque 323 Nm 168 Nm
Drive Type 4WD Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1208 kg 1299 kg
Vehicle Length 5130 mm 4140 mm
Vehicle Width 1790 mm 1730 mm
Vehicle Height 1730 mm 1610 mm
Wheelbase Size 3200 mm 2460 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 14.7 L/100km 8 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 74 L 60 L