2004 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1975 Mazda RX 4 Coupe
To start off, 2004 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mazda RX 4 Coupe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mazda RX 4 Coupe would be higher. At 3,932 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Thunderbird (280 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 166 more horse power than 1975 Mazda RX 4 Coupe. (114 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1975 Mazda RX 4 Coupe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 642 kg more than 1975 Mazda RX 4 Coupe. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Thunderbird (369 Nm) has 204 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Mazda RX 4 Coupe. (165 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Thunderbird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Mazda RX 4 Coupe.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Thunderbird | 1975 Mazda RX 4 Coupe | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Thunderbird | RX 4 Coupe |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1975 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3932 cc | 2616 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 280 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 369 Nm | 165 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2520 mm |
