2004 Holden UTE vs. 1963 Pontiac Tempest
To start off, 2004 Holden UTE is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Pontiac Tempest. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Pontiac Tempest would be higher. At 6,376 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Pontiac Tempest is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Pontiac Tempest (295 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 2004 Holden UTE. (204 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Pontiac Tempest should accelerate faster than 2004 Holden UTE. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Holden UTE weights approximately 90 kg more than 1963 Pontiac Tempest.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Holden UTE | 1963 Pontiac Tempest | |
| Make | Holden | Pontiac |
| Model | UTE | Tempest |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3791 cc | 6376 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 204 HP | 295 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1410 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 5160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2930 mm |
