2004 Jaguar XK vs. 1982 Lancia A 112
To start off, 2004 Jaguar XK is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Lancia A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Lancia A 112 would be higher. At 4,194 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jaguar XK weights approximately 1178 kg more than 1982 Lancia A 112.
Because 2004 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Lancia A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Jaguar XK | 1982 Lancia A 112 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Lancia |
| Model | XK | A 112 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
| Engine Size | 4194 cc | 903 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 390 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1833 kg | 655 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3230 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2040 mm |
