2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1961 Mitsubishi A10
To start off, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Mitsubishi A10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Mitsubishi A10 would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 175 more horse power than 1961 Mitsubishi A10. (20 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1961 Mitsubishi A10. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 1289 kg more than 1961 Mitsubishi A10. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 278 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Mitsubishi A10. (34 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Mitsubishi A10.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1961 Mitsubishi A10 | |
| Make | Jeep | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Grand Cherokee | A10 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1961 |
| Engine Size | 3966 cc | 493 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 195 HP | 20 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 312 Nm | 34 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1764 kg | 475 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 3150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1400 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2070 mm |
