2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2003 Peugeot 106
To start off, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Peugeot 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Peugeot 106 would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 2003 Peugeot 106. (59 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2003 Peugeot 106. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 984 kg more than 2003 Peugeot 106. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 225 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Peugeot 106. (87 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Peugeot 106.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 2003 Peugeot 106 | |
| Make | Jeep | Peugeot |
| Model | Grand Cherokee | 106 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3966 cc | 1124 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 195 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 312 Nm | 87 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 99 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 69 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1764 kg | 780 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 3570 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1580 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2390 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 40 L |
