2004 Kia Rio vs. 2013 Honda CR-Z
To start off, 2013 Honda CR-Z is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Kia Rio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Kia Rio would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Kia Rio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Honda CR-Z (120 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 2004 Kia Rio. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Honda CR-Z should accelerate faster than 2004 Kia Rio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Honda CR-Z weights approximately 157 kg more than 2004 Kia Rio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Honda CR-Z (174 Nm) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Kia Rio. (141 Nm). This means 2013 Honda CR-Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Kia Rio.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Kia Rio | 2013 Honda CR-Z | |
| Make | Kia | Honda |
| Model | Rio | CR-Z |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1590 cc | 1497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 120 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 141 Nm | 174 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 73 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 89 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.4 : 1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 1247 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4079 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1394 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2435 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 7.1 L/100km | 5 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 9.1 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 40 L |
