2004 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1995 Toyota Crown
To start off, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Toyota Crown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Toyota Crown would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1295 kg more than 1995 Toyota Crown.
Because 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Toyota Crown. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover has automatic transmission and 1995 Toyota Crown has manual transmission. 1995 Toyota Crown will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Land Rover Range Rover | 1995 Toyota Crown | |
| Make | Land Rover | Toyota |
| Model | Range Rover | Crown |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4398 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 282 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2515 kg | 1220 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2200 mm | 1770 mm |
