2004 Lincoln LS vs. 2002 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2004 Lincoln LS is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Nissan X-Trail. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Nissan X-Trail would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lincoln LS (232 HP) has 89 more horse power than 2002 Nissan X-Trail. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 2002 Nissan X-Trail. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Lincoln LS weights approximately 402 kg more than 2002 Nissan X-Trail. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Lincoln LS (298 Nm) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Nissan X-Trail. (192 Nm). This means 2004 Lincoln LS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Nissan X-Trail.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Lincoln LS | 2002 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | Lincoln | Nissan |
| Model | LS | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2966 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 232 HP | 143 HP |
| Torque | 298 Nm | 192 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1687 kg | 1285 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2540 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 60 L |
