2004 Mazda Demio vs. 2008 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda Demio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda Demio would be higher. At 1,323 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda Demio is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Renault Clio weights approximately 25 kg more than 2004 Mazda Demio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Renault Clio (105 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda Demio. (101 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda Demio.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda Demio | 2008 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | Demio | Clio |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Size | 1323 cc | 1149 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 101 Nm | 105 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 985 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3820 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2480 mm |