2004 MCC Crossblade vs. 2004 MG TF
To start off, both 2004 MCC Crossblade and 2004 MG TF were released in the same year (2004). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 MG TF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 MG TF (114 HP) has 44 more horse power than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 MG TF should accelerate faster than 2004 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 MG TF weights approximately 360 kg more than 2004 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 MG TF (145 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 2004 MG TF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 MCC Crossblade | 2004 MG TF | |
| Make | MCC | MG |
| Model | Crossblade | TF |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 1588 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 114 HP |
| Torque | 102 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3210 RPM | 4700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1270 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2380 mm |
