2004 MCC Smart vs. 1999 Suzuki C2
To start off, 2004 MCC Smart is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Suzuki C2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Suzuki C2 would be higher. At 1,600 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Suzuki C2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Suzuki C2 (251 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 191 more horse power than 2004 MCC Smart. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Suzuki C2 should accelerate faster than 2004 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Suzuki C2 weights approximately 122 kg more than 2004 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Suzuki C2 (284 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 189 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 MCC Smart. (95 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1999 Suzuki C2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 MCC Smart | 1999 Suzuki C2 | |
| Make | MCC | Suzuki |
| Model | Smart | C2 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 696 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 251 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 95 Nm | 284 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 852 kg |
